We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Responsibility Act of 2559
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2561
Description[?]:
| The Responsibility Act of 2559. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Proposed: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:05:12, April 11, 2008 CET | From | New Socialist Alliance | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | Article's 1-3 are insane, but 4 we agree with. |
| Date | 19:04:46, April 11, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | It's not insane, you just don't agree with it. Oh wait what! The government not able to take private property is insane? Communists... |
| Date | 22:55:07, April 11, 2008 CET | From | Alorian Public Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | We can only ever support article 1, and this one we still aren't so sure on. |
| Date | 23:23:45, April 11, 2008 CET | From | New Socialist Alliance | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | The President and Head of Government are separate for a reason We make the Presidnet Head of Government we have to give him a key to the cabinet offices and he could lock cabinet out again. They are separate positions to restrict the power of the President to stop him becoming a dictator |
| Date | 18:26:27, April 12, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | Dictator? Fool. That's an insult to the people. And I do say, Thompson would do hell of a better job then you. At least he would do something. Instead of just lazing around |
| Date | 22:35:13, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Alorian Public Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | Ok, I'm sold. |
| Date | 22:47:59, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | Generally, we prefer spreading power through more people instead of fewer people. By separating the functions of the offices of PM and President, less power is concentrated into the hands of a single person. |
| Date | 22:48:41, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | ooc: Also gives us two "number 1 jobs" to play with, which is more fun than just one. |
| Date | 23:04:09, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Alorian Public Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | BTW, I understand the "I'm sold" above may be seen as an insult to DSP. I didn't mean it as such, I have nothing against your party's Prime Minister. |
| Date | 23:27:03, April 13, 2008 CET | From | United Republican Party (FFL) | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | Maybe it's just me but I can only see Article 1 of this bill, unless the other three articles were edited out. |
| Date | 04:01:48, April 14, 2008 CET | From | Alorian Public Union | To | Debating the Responsibility Act of 2559 |
| Message | They were |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 242 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 508 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
| Random quote: "Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools." - Napoleon Bonaparte |