We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judicial System
Details
Submitted by[?]: Frente de Libertação de Vintãli
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2564
Description[?]:
We propose the establishment of a Gaduridos Supreme Court of Justice, to have five justices, appointed by the legislature for staggered 5-year terms (OOC: 15 real-life days). The Supreme Court of Justice would have the power of judicial review. (OOC: This would be RPd.) |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:54:53, April 18, 2008 CET | From | Populistas de Pedernera | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | We have concerns the VRP would abuse this power. We must vote no. |
Date | 03:06:36, April 18, 2008 CET | From | Frente de Libertação de Vintãli | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | We have changed this so that the legislature appoints the justices. |
Date | 03:12:29, April 18, 2008 CET | From | Frente de Libertação de Vintãli | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | Does the Zambrano Junta support this? |
Date | 04:07:43, April 18, 2008 CET | From | Vintalli Representative Party | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | We have concerns that the Zambrano Junta are simply trying to find excuses by blaming a party that has NEVER even ATTEMPTED such a thing. |
Date | 21:57:50, April 18, 2008 CET | From | Populistas de Pedernera | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | We could support this, but still have concerns of abuses. The VRP has failed Gaduridos and must be taken out of power. Thier continual inaction concerning crises of the world and the nation are borderline treacherous. |
Date | 03:03:13, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Frente de Libertação de Vintãli | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | Why is the Zambrano Junta voting against a bill that would bring the rule of law to Gaduridos? This bill would actually help prevent any abuses the VRP may be conducting, if they are in violation of the law, since the courts could overturn them if they are in violation of the Constitution or the law. |
Date | 03:19:28, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Populistas de Pedernera | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | We have continued concerns that this court will not be respectful of the principles that made this nation great. Namely, Communist influence of the court would be too much of a security issue resulting in more unrest and violence. We feel the status quo is better than a Communist rubber stamp court. |
Date | 03:29:12, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Frente de Libertação de Vintãli | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | The court will not be a Communist rubber stamp. We believe that there should be an equal number of Communist and capitalist justices. We propose this composition of the court: Chief Justice - Zambrano Junta Associate Justice #1 - (GCCP) H.P. Sauce Committee Associate Justice #2 - Free Movement of Gaduridos Associate Justice #3 - Peoples' Socialist Workers Party Associate Justice #4 - Zambrano Junta With that proposal, there would be 2 Communists, 1 moderate, and 2 capitalists. |
Date | 03:43:05, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Frente de Libertação de Vintãli | To | Debating the Judicial System |
Message | Would that be acceptable to the Zambrano Junta? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 297 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 109 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 94 |
Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election. |
Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle |