Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 01:03:30
Server time: 14:56:29, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2563

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet that I think is proportional to seats gained.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:45:57, April 17, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageFDP 120/600 = 0.2 * 13 = 2.6 -> 2
DSP 108/600 = 0.18 * 13 = 2.34 -> 2
CP 85/600 = 0.1417 * 13 = 1.8417 -> 2
SCP 85/600 = 0.1417 * 13 = 1.8417 -> 2
USMC 80/600 = 0.1333 * 13 = 1.733 -> 2
NPP 57/600 = 0.095 * 13 = 1.235 -> 1
PSFA 33/600 = 0.055 * 13 = 0.715 -> 1
AUP = 32/600 = 0.0533 * 13 = 0.6933 -> 1

as per Proportional Cabinet bill by IC: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773

Date22:08:49, April 17, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageFor future reference we prefer Sci&Tech, Health and Education.

Date03:46:34, April 18, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageWe would also like Finance, just to put it out there....

Date04:31:11, April 18, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageWe strongly prefer:
1. Education & Culture
2. Finance

Date05:29:26, April 18, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageI think this is the first time we've had a unanimous vote on anything in 50 years.

Date05:45:02, April 18, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageToo bad that the Independents are not around to see the fruits of their labours?

Date14:22:47, April 18, 2008 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageWe are sligtly irked that we hold the same number of positions as the USMC, even though our seats are 50% greater than theirs

Date02:11:33, April 19, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageOOC: You should be honored to share something in common with us!

Date02:11:42, April 19, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageOOC: You should be honored to share something in common with us!

Date04:26:17, April 19, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of 2562
MessageWe hold the same number of spots as the AUP, even though we have roughly 50% more than them, too. But we don't particularly mind.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 600

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

      Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 81