Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:44:22
Server time: 07:15:37, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Imports Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2116

Description[?]:

In order to protect the Malivian economy and further the cause of fair trade, the government should be able impose light tariffs on certain imports.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:47:13, September 17, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
Messagewhich ones and how much. I am not necessarily against it, but what I would rather see is our trading treaty expanded, and for those not covered by that either a ban on goods produced in countries with unfair labor practices or a heavy tariff on these materials its level set at high enough that the companies gain nothing by producing in those countries.

Date03:17:11, September 18, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
MessageThis is a good beginning.

Date13:47:27, September 18, 2005 CET
FromUnited Labour Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
Message"Which ones and how much" is a matter for the finance minister. This is just to give him or her the economic tools they need.

Date14:59:30, September 18, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
MessageWe agree with PP on banning or heavily penalising imports from countries with unfair labour practices.

Date18:34:17, September 19, 2005 CET
FromUnited Labour Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
Message"This is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or embargo"

There's your answer, and I agree.

Date21:27:51, September 19, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
Messages owe would support provided that wording to the effect of tarriffs only from nations and in goods engaged in unfair labor practices. And for those products produced in such a manner the tarriffs will be of least a level to negate the advantage of these method have over those used in our nation. Note we aren't saying they need to pay the same rate etc. just that they need to provide the same relative pay and promote safe conditions etc.

we do not support protective tariffs, just fair trade.

Date19:10:48, September 23, 2005 CET
FromUnited Labour Party
ToDebating the Imports Act
MessageThe finance minister chooses the tariffs, and that's you.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 89

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 11


    Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

    Random quote: "I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization." - Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63