We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Vice-President Nomination
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2564
Description[?]:
This bill has as its purpose to nominate Jonathan Jackson frrom the Lodamun Libertarian Party (LLP) as the Vice-President of the United Republics of Lodamun. A debate phase will take place for 3-6 months until November 2563 or as determined by Parliament, where the nominee will be asked questions. As dictated by law, A majority of Parliament will be needed to approve the nominee, as of now it stands at 76 votes.
President David Porter |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:19:15, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | Please read the entire sentence, you always do the same thing. I said, a majority of Parliament is needed, which would be 76 votes, (50% +1), I didn't say 76 votes were yes. |
| Date | 05:20:00, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | The Liberals and LLP have marched in lock step for years. Clearly this is the time to reach out to other parties. I suggest a DPLP candidate. |
| Date | 05:21:56, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | I have said this many times, the people made their decision in April when they voted. If you don't like the nominee, then vote no. |
| Date | 05:28:08, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | Well, that is your choice, I won't argue with that. But since you complain so often and it is really annoying, you should ask some questions to the nominee, just a suggestion. |
| Date | 05:36:34, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | Watch your language! You do the same thing everytime you feel you have lost, hey, you can't win everytime. Myself and the LLP are more than capable to handle the positions we currently hold. Like I said before, if you don't like it vote no, but stop those insults, you will not get anywhere by insulting people. And they are getting very annoying. |
| Date | 05:42:55, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | The Liberal party is the most incompetent party to hold cabinet posts. The LP is irresponsible and brazenly violates laws. If the LP is so capable why haven't we secured a peace treaty with Likatonia? |
| Date | 05:48:32, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | They didn't accept the treaty we proposed, that is their fault, not mine. During the years we have been in power we have made great accomplishments. The laws are more democratic, we have made agreements with allies, the surplus increased, and the people are happier. Sorry, but that doesn't qualify as incompetent. |
| Date | 05:51:46, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | This is a debate for the vice-president nominee, not for other issues. Let's leave it out of this debate, please. |
| Date | 06:01:34, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | This is a discussion about whethr we want the old LLP/LP regime to remain in power, or do we expand it? That would make our nation more democratic rather than the so-called "accomplishments" of the LP which can't be named - either "for security reasons" or because they don't exist. |
| Date | 06:04:01, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | Maybe you haven't read the title of this debate. This is the nomination of the vice-president, we are not talking about the accomplishments of any party but what the nominee thinks about the issues and what his accomplishments are. |
| Date | 20:40:36, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | Jonathan Jackson has served in the parliament for the last 5 terms. Before that he served 2 terms in the Golavian regional assembly. During his time in the parliament he has been a member of the foreign relations committee for 2 term, then he moved on to the judiciary committee where he was 1 term, before he moved to the armed forces committee where he has been since, and which he is chairman off at the moment. |
| Date | 22:07:30, April 19, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Vice-President Nomination | | Message | It seems that Parliament does not have many questions. The six months have passed, I am going to put the bill up for vote.
President David Porter |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 96 |
| no | Total Seats: 52 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
| Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
| Random quote: "Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." - John Maynard Keynes |