Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 01:27:08
Server time: 02:32:51, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Radnat Agenda 2563

Details

Submitted by[?]: Meritocratic Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2564

Description[?]:

Some things we'd like to see enacted

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:14:42, April 19, 2008 CET
FromFederal Republican Party
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageWe would ask the S.R.N.P. to leave this up for debate if they are willing to work in the spirit of bipartisanship. The F.R.P. isn't entirely fond of this proposal however, we do very much like a majority of the articles within the bill and would be willing to support it on certain grounds. Is the S.R.N.P. willing to indulge the Senate or shall this be rushed to a vote?

Party Spokesman,
Ron Seigler

Date19:16:09, April 19, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageWe can leave it up for debate, yes.

Senator Howie Jules, SRNP

Date19:51:01, April 19, 2008 CET
FromNational Zeus Party
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageWe have issues with article 2 , you can not force someone to believe in a religion, especially if it is not a religion of their choice and we can not support withdraw from the global emanicipation treaty that just recently was ratified. Other than that we have no objections.

Mary Abramov
Ingram Party Chairperson

Date20:31:26, April 19, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageWe could remove the position to remove the global emancipation treaty.

Date20:39:31, April 19, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
Messageooc: due to game play reasons we seem to not have the ability to remove that, actually.

Date02:04:49, April 20, 2008 CET
FromAutonomist Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageAn excerpt of a message received from the SRNP earlier this year:

"The treaty of emancipation will pass, and with that we will not attempt to have it removed for the foreseeable future."

And already you are trying to overturn it, despite your 'claim' that you wish to remove it from this bill. You could delete the bill and redo the entire proposal, it is not that difficult and you won't lose any of your quota.

Date05:42:50, April 20, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageNaah

Date08:08:07, April 20, 2008 CET
FromFederal Republican Party
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageNaah? Eloquence at it's finest! If the S.R.N.P. wishes to continue with their agenda proposals with no coherency involvement we will not be able to or bother in trying to stop the radicals. You could have had the support of others, more than your lackeys anyways had you been thoughtful enough to engage in a more elevated discourse with your peers. "Naah" doesn't quite make the cut. The F.R.P. will abstain or shall vote No should this incomprehensible bill risk of being passed. Then, the F.R.P. shall work to pursue those articles in which we find ourselves in agreement with the S.R.N.P. The F.R.P. as a suggestion would like to inform the S.R.N.P. that pandering for votes is fairly clear to those whom have the ability to form coherent thoughts and clearly; this is what we see out of you here and in the past.

Signed,
Party Spokesman, Ron Seigler

Date16:12:34, April 20, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageWe do not pander for votes. Vote yes or no. Debating is rarely worthwhile.

Date22:31:53, April 20, 2008 CET
FromAutonomist Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Radnat Agenda 2563
MessageI believe the FRP meant pandering for votes in the senate, but I could be wrong.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 102

no
     

Total Seats: 96

abstain
  

Total Seats: 227


Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 103