We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Radnat Agenda 2563
Details
Submitted by[?]: Meritocratic Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2564
Description[?]:
Some things we'd like to see enacted |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Global Emancipation Treaty.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Government owned amenities are not segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation does not impose any tariffs or quotas on imports.
Current: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Proposed: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Current: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Proposed: All schools are required to be religious in nature.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Current: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Proposed: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change The teacher's right to discipline children.
Old value:: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Current: Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion.
Proposed: Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion.
Article 10
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 425
Current: 75
Proposed: 750
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:14:42, April 19, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | We would ask the S.R.N.P. to leave this up for debate if they are willing to work in the spirit of bipartisanship. The F.R.P. isn't entirely fond of this proposal however, we do very much like a majority of the articles within the bill and would be willing to support it on certain grounds. Is the S.R.N.P. willing to indulge the Senate or shall this be rushed to a vote? Party Spokesman, Ron Seigler |
Date | 19:16:09, April 19, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | We can leave it up for debate, yes. Senator Howie Jules, SRNP |
Date | 19:51:01, April 19, 2008 CET | From | National Zeus Party | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | We have issues with article 2 , you can not force someone to believe in a religion, especially if it is not a religion of their choice and we can not support withdraw from the global emanicipation treaty that just recently was ratified. Other than that we have no objections. Mary Abramov Ingram Party Chairperson |
Date | 20:31:26, April 19, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | We could remove the position to remove the global emancipation treaty. |
Date | 20:39:31, April 19, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | ooc: due to game play reasons we seem to not have the ability to remove that, actually. |
Date | 02:04:49, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Autonomist Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | An excerpt of a message received from the SRNP earlier this year: "The treaty of emancipation will pass, and with that we will not attempt to have it removed for the foreseeable future." And already you are trying to overturn it, despite your 'claim' that you wish to remove it from this bill. You could delete the bill and redo the entire proposal, it is not that difficult and you won't lose any of your quota. |
Date | 05:42:50, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | Naah |
Date | 08:08:07, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | Naah? Eloquence at it's finest! If the S.R.N.P. wishes to continue with their agenda proposals with no coherency involvement we will not be able to or bother in trying to stop the radicals. You could have had the support of others, more than your lackeys anyways had you been thoughtful enough to engage in a more elevated discourse with your peers. "Naah" doesn't quite make the cut. The F.R.P. will abstain or shall vote No should this incomprehensible bill risk of being passed. Then, the F.R.P. shall work to pursue those articles in which we find ourselves in agreement with the S.R.N.P. The F.R.P. as a suggestion would like to inform the S.R.N.P. that pandering for votes is fairly clear to those whom have the ability to form coherent thoughts and clearly; this is what we see out of you here and in the past. Signed, Party Spokesman, Ron Seigler |
Date | 16:12:34, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | We do not pander for votes. Vote yes or no. Debating is rarely worthwhile. |
Date | 22:31:53, April 20, 2008 CET | From | Autonomist Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Radnat Agenda 2563 |
Message | I believe the FRP meant pandering for votes in the senate, but I could be wrong. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 102 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 96 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 227 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn |