We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Revolution Bill 2566
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2567
Description[?]:
| To secure a strong economy where the organs of the nation work for the health of the state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:00:31, April 25, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | See Chidan. What is right-wing about this bill? |
| Date | 09:59:55, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | We only support the nationalisation of the energy sector. |
| Date | 14:33:47, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Chidan Party | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | This bill may show evidence of extreme left economic beliefs, which we oppose and feel could ruin any economy, but the fundamental beliefs of this party are still very much, right wing. As a left leaning party, our primary concern is for equality, for everyone in the nation, something we as a left party have worked to achieve, the same cannot be said for the right, in fact, this party's attempt at dividing the nation reflect right wing politics much more accurately than left. |
| Date | 15:24:46, April 25, 2008 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | The public should not be fooled by the Chidan Party and it does a disservice to right wing politics that it should be branded as divisive. We promote these policies so they can work for the benefit of the nation state not for the creation of a nanny state which goes totally against our principles of social darwinism and competition. |
| Date | 16:25:09, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | A44 are delighted to hear Chidan Party distancing themselves from 'extreme left economic beliefs'. A44 themselves are not willing to cooperate with radical parties of either extremes. However A44 believes energy shall be provided by a nationalised corporation. We still stand for the regulations described in our defeated Endralon National Energy Trust Bill 2564 (and we strongly disagree the Confederates' rather discourteous comments on that). |
| Date | 16:28:37, April 25, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | Social Darwinists aren't necessarily fascists. Herbert Spencer was a social darwinist and a liberal. |
| Date | 16:35:50, April 25, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | We reject the Chidanite faith in equality. In all things, liberty should come before equality. Equality of law is the only equality consistent with liberty. Any policy aimed towards equality of outcome must contravene liberty, because the free actions of individuals will, through iterative replication, create natural inequalities. |
| Date | 16:36:01, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | Spencer was a social lamarckist. |
| Date | 16:38:40, April 25, 2008 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | We are not facists and any uneducated fool who describes us as so does not deserve to participate in Endralonian politics. We are National Socialists! |
| Date | 17:45:07, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Legally Stoned Democrats | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | Yep. You're not fascists you are nazis. Any educated man knows the difference, but there's at least one similarity: both ideas are disgusting... |
| Date | 18:03:48, April 25, 2008 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | Either a mastiff or a pug, you call both of them a dog ... |
| Date | 09:30:43, April 27, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Economic Revolution Bill 2566 |
| Message | Social lamarckism was a popular theory at the time. The main crux of Spencer's ideas survive without the lamarckism, and the Dawkinite concept of "memes" is its latest manifestation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 381 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "The difference between a republic and a people's republic is a lot like the difference between a jacket and a straightjacket." - Ronald Reagan |