We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Anti Common Courtesy Bill

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Kanjoran Imperial Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2115

Description^[?]:

Ammends the common courtesy bill...

There is now no way to legally enforce the common courtesy bill. It will only be enforced by common decency and courtesy to the rest of the parties and to the Kanjor Republic.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	00:15:32, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	But but but....why won't anyone recofgnize my reasoning?

Date	00:19:25, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	The common courtesy bill allows for more organized debate and keeps people from just imposing their views on eachother without any discussion. Am I the only person who holds the sharing of beliefs sacred in this country?

Date	00:35:21, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	Ok I'll give this some thought.

Date	00:35:46, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Populist Liberal Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	I'd love to see robust debate occur, but I don't see overly restrictive laws as needed for it to be possible. Debate can even occur during the voting phase. I'd rather amend the CCL to more specifically prevent proposal stealing than to get rid of the law entirely; however, the current law with its current restrictions is too easily open to abuse. If the only choice is between current CCL and none, I'd choose none.

Date	04:27:36, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran Imperial Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	Yes, there is also disagreement about the legality of making orders in non-proposal bills

Date	11:32:57, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Nationalist Freedom Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	I think we should keep the common courtesy bill. Its only common courtesy, not to propose the same proposal, while another party is proposing one.

Date	17:20:06, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	I always get funny feeling in my heart when me and FFP can find someone common ground.

Date	17:25:43, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	I see the dire need for this bill to keep players in check, but I also see the problem with abstaining from voting. Abstaining helps no one involved but the perpetrator.Therefore, I won't support this bill to abolish the Common Courtesy bill, but I do support amending the bill to remove the punishment aspect (unless another form can be thought of). It would then become a good will bill,and hopefully there are no parties who would continously break it for lack of consequences.

Date	18:18:22, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran Imperial Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	Ok, i'll revise this one... The common courtesy bill will just be common courtesy.

Date	21:51:41, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Populist Liberal Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	That sounds like a fair compromise to me.

Date	23:08:29, September 18, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran People's Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	I will support this one then. Later, I may post a whole new bill to replace the last so that the edit is included in the document.

Date	04:50:43, September 19, 2005 CET
From	Kanjoran Imperial Party
To	Debating the The Anti Common Courtesy Bill
Message	ok, great

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 366

Nationalist Freedom Party (74)

Total Seats: 74

abstain

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church." - Thomas Paine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63