Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:45:07
Server time: 23:14:52, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2113

Description[?]:

The Anarch Anakrousite responds to unrest between Likatonia and some of it's closer neighbours, with legislation to increase the safety of Likatonian borders, and increase the economic sustainability of our defences.

The AAP offers the suggestion that Chemical and Nuclear deterrence be unconditional, that trade in (conventional) arms be unlimited (although STILL regulated), and that our defences be shored up.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:30:45, September 18, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)
MessageWe have just voted down three out of these four issues. As a peaceful country I don't think Likatonia has the need or the right to threaten the safety of others in these ways.

Date02:58:43, September 18, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)
MessageThe AAP doesn't see this as 'threatening' other nations, merely showing a determined face. The AAP happily admits that it doesn't expect this motion to pass this time, or on subsequent occassions... and we are prepared for that. However, in all likelihood, the AAP will continually raise these issues, periodically.

We thank the LPE for their consideration.

Date06:17:22, September 18, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)
MessageThe AAP sees no further comments. Motion moved to the vote.

Date10:06:27, September 18, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)
MessageGiven chance to add comments, we would have, but now its gone to vote anyhow.

Date18:14:48, September 18, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security (iv)
MessageThe AAP would still welcome Royalist opinions, since such measures will doubtlessly be introduced again at later dates. However, once the AAP has watched a Bill sit for half a year with only one comment, we often feel that it might be worth moving it on.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 79

no
    

Total Seats: 150

abstain
  

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science." - Dr. Martin Keeley

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71