We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0098.2567 Foreign Marriage Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2568
Description[?]:
| Eliminating recognition of obscene marriages. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:52:46, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0098.2567 Foreign Marriage Bill |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 04:17:33, April 28, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0098.2567 Foreign Marriage Bill |
| Message | We are opposed. |
| Date | 03:25:01, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0098.2567 Foreign Marriage Bill |
| Message | Consdering how liberal our policy is, I don't see how this would change anything :P |
| Date | 07:30:17, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0098.2567 Foreign Marriage Bill |
| Message | Despite the fact of our liberal policy, there may be more liberal policies out there, and, we believe that no marriage to an inanimate object (which has been attempted, at times) should be recognized. We should only allow marriages which are valid within our own laws. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 351 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 249 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "The European Union and environmental advocacy groups use global warming hysteria to advance their own special agendas. The European Union recognizes any significant reduction in CO2 emissions by the United States will significantly reduce its economic output, thereby bringing it closer to the inferior output of European nations. Environmental advocacy groups work to stifle economic and industrial progress wherever they find it to inhibit the successful advancement of peoples in developing nations, inevitably making mankind a second class citizen of planet Earth." - Dr. Jay Lehr |