We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Appropriate Dressing Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2568
Description[?]:
This bill will: 1) Leave the duties of determining the legality and regulation of crossdressing to local governments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:41:17, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Appropriate Dressing Act |
Message | Putting the word regulation in the bill description does not really help, but I think everyone should be allowed to dress the way they want, and that the local government willl just deny that right in some places |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 44 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 89 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 17 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens." - John Maynard Keynes |