We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of January 2568
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kafuri Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2568
Description[?]:
| The Kafuri Socialist Party (KLC) propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the United Emirates of Kafuristan. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 500,000,000 KAF | 20,000,000,000 KAF | 20,000,000,000 KAF |
| Foreign Affairs | 4,000,000,000 KAF | 50,000,000,000 KAF | 40,000,000,000 KAF |
| Internal Affairs | 55,000,000,000 KAF | 20,000,000,000 KAF | 10,000,000,000 KAF |
| Finance | 2,700,000,000 KAF | 50,000,000,000 KAF | 45,000,000,000 KAF |
| Defence | 200,000,000,000 KAF | 1,190,680,000,000 KAF | 1,200,000,000,000 KAF |
| Justice | 6,000,000,000 KAF | 60,000,000,000 KAF | 60,000,000,000 KAF |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 101,000,000,000 KAF | 120,000,000,000 KAF | 200,000,000,000 KAF |
| Health and Social Services | 205,000,000,000 KAF | 180,000,000,000 KAF | 200,000,000,000 KAF |
| Education and Culture | 132,000,000,000 KAF | 200,000,000,000 KAF | 300,000,000,000 KAF |
| Science and Technology | 35,000,000,000 KAF | 50,000,000,000 KAF | 100,000,000,000 KAF |
| Food and Agriculture | 44,000,000,000 KAF | 40,000,000,000 KAF | 40,000,000,000 KAF |
| Environment and Tourism | 5,000,000,000 KAF | 20,000,000,000 KAF | 20,000,000,000 KAF |
| Trade and Industry | 47,000,000,000 KAF | 40,000,000,000 KAF | 200,000,000,000 KAF |
| Total | 837,200,000,000 KAF | 2,040,680,000,000 KAF | 2,435,000,000,000 KAF |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:35:23, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the Budget proposal of January 2568 |
| Message | We support this move, but believe more money should be placed in Infrastructure rather then trade and industry. |
| Date | 10:57:39, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Aldurian Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of January 2568 |
| Message | As the new income tax proposal is not going to pass, we shall oppose this budget as it would be wrong to back the spending, but not the financing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 308 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 346 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "When strangers start acting like neighbors, communities are reinvigorated." - Ralph Nader |