Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 01:22:10
Server time: 22:37:49, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): dnobb | GLNBei | ImperialLodamun | reformist2024 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Super fun happy act

Details

Submitted by[?]: trucido ignarae Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2113

Description[?]:

don't mind me, i'm just making random bills so i can be noticed by the people. Being less than 2 seats for 5 elections in a row is both depressing and embarresing

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:47:21, September 18, 2005 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Super fun happy act
MessageUnless the LLP can convince us otherwise (coz they usually do), the proposed seems fairly ok.

Date05:55:39, September 19, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Super fun happy act
MessageWell we have a non-aggressive foreign policy. This proposal will make our foreign policy very aggressive and many, namely our neighbours, will be concerned about where we will be headed next.

Quite frankly, I see no purpose in this. Its just the sort of thing authoritarians want to do so they can wank off on their own power.

Date21:33:56, September 19, 2005 CET
Fromtrucido ignarae Party
ToDebating the Super fun happy act
Messageno, that's what porn is for =P jk

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 137

no
  

Total Seats: 233

abstain
   

Total Seats: 96


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54