We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Federalist Civil Rights Initiative of 2568
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2569
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Current: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Proposed: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Education for children under adult age.
Old value:: Education is compulsory and has to happen at school.
Current: Education is entirely voluntary.
Proposed: Education is compulsory, but home schooling is permitted.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: People must first obtain a permit in order to carry concealed weapons.
Current: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Proposed: Local governments may set and enforce concealed carry laws.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: The government actively promotes population growth.
Current: The government does not engage in population control.
Proposed: Population control is left to local governments.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relation laws are set by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:55:40, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Federalist Civil Rights Initiative of 2568 |
Message | Submitted on behalf of the F.R.P. by Senator Orrin Ramsay for the purpose of debate before pushed to a vote. |
Date | 16:14:55, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Federalist Civil Rights Initiative of 2568 |
Message | We cannot get behind an initiative which would decentralize the government too much. |
Date | 17:56:11, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Federalist Civil Rights Initiative of 2568 |
Message | We usually agree with decentralization and delegation as a party, but these are laws which shouldn't be left to local government and we should all have the same law everywhere for. For example, how are local governments supposed to deal with Population Growth? Surely, this is an issue for the Foreign and Interior Ministries and their civil servants about border control, one region and one local government cannot dictate about immigration for their area and not have national government know about who is and who isn't coming into our country. Bob Harrison, People Party Leader |
Date | 22:24:13, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Anarcho-Atheist League | To | Debating the Federalist Civil Rights Initiative of 2568 |
Message | We oppose this much localization, but as a side note could support article 5 alone |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 109 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 300 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan (1911 - 2004) |