Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:34:07
Server time: 17:25:52, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Political Bloc's

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2578

Description[?]:

Since the whole Political Bloc thing sort of fell apart originally, do to various things I figure it would be a good idea to form new political blocs.
Now, since we have diverse parties, I think we could form three different blocs, but I suppose it may end up being only two.

Anyways, obviously Bloc's need to be formed before anyone can join them, so if you have an idea for a bloc, post it, and anyone else who
wants to join a bloc, post the details of it.
Bloc's should have a clear ideology (you don't have to agree on everything, just some important things) and a decided upon name and color.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Until everyone decides otherwise I'm counting the parties and bloc's thusly;

Sekowia Universalis (official)
-ISP
-USMC

Rightist bloc (unofficial)
-CP
-AUP
-NPP
-AFFS

Communist bloc (unofficial)
-SCP


Once everyone has set up blocs, or decided to not be in a bloc officially, please let me know so that we can have an official system.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:25:59, April 30, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageProgressive Libertarian Socialist's Alliance:
-Progressivism
-Social libertarianism
-Libertarian Socialism
-Medium government

Date05:33:10, May 01, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageRevisionist capitalist running dogs.

Date05:38:59, May 01, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageWho pissed in your cornflakes..

Date23:55:33, May 01, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageWhat is the purpose of political blocs? Advantages, disadvantages? Purpose?

Date00:43:19, May 02, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageWell it's half for RP reasons, it makes the game more interesting and half for game mechanic reasons, like the members of each bloc support the main party of their bloc's candidacy for Tenno.

Date05:16:51, May 02, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageIs the main party always the same?

Date07:01:37, May 02, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageDepends on what the members of the bloc decide, the main party would most likely be the party that has the most seats though I suppose.

Date08:50:06, May 02, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageAt least that's the method that would certainly serve the DSP's interests best.

Date17:23:14, May 02, 2008 CET
FromAnti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageIsn't that what the game's about? Self-interest about progress for the country?

Date19:37:02, May 02, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageBetterment of Sekowo is what we the representatives are suppose to strive for. Then again, like in real life, there are always political struggles and scandals. =)

I don't like there always being a main party based on number of seats. I'd prefer a federal council with all parties represented and a rotation with everyone but game mechanics do not allow it.

Date00:33:33, May 03, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageWell like I said, each bloc would decide who the main part was, I'm just saying what most people would base it on.

I actually like the idea of a rotating main party in each bloc for each election.

Date03:29:24, May 05, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageJa. Rotation is best. How many blocs would there be? Three? Four? We only have 8 parties. Not much to work with.

Date05:23:51, May 05, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageI figure there would be three main blocs.

Though now I'm thinking we may have two levels, one for the pro-empire parties, and one against empire, then the second set would be where the other ideologies come into play.

Date07:09:20, May 06, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageJa. Not sure if that will be balanced though. It seems there are pro-Imperial parties, pro-Imperial policy parties and anti-Imperial parties.

Date18:36:06, May 07, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageNow that I've reverted back (even that short time provided some history), I suppose it's now pro-imperial policy and anti-imperialist in regards to that particular area.

Date19:50:33, May 18, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageI'm IMF now :)

Date01:20:04, May 19, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageWe don't like being called "rightist".

Date01:22:58, May 19, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessagePending support from the other members of the Free Sekowo Coalition, we may consider ourselves a bloc. This would include all of those which you have placed under "rightists".

Date05:28:44, May 19, 2008 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageI don't think that the ISP knows about the FSC. Otherwise they would not have labeled us "unofficial."

Date05:50:18, May 19, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Political Bloc's
MessageNope, no idea about that.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 244

no
   

Total Seats: 184

abstain
  

Total Seats: 163


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 86