Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:46:38
Server time: 04:13:21, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Embargo Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Frente de Libertação de Vintãli

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2572

Description[?]:

In response to the L'olam situation, a bill is being voted on in Beiteynu (http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=189075) that would declare war on the GXH party and L'olam, confiscate all of the GXH's assets without compensation, and try all members of the GXH for treason before the Beiteynu Supreme Court. This is a political prosecution, and that bill proposes to take away their assets without any compensation and prosecute them, simply because they want L'olam to be independent. Prosecution for holding political views is a violation of basic rights. Therefore, we propose to start an embargo against Beiteynu if that bill passes.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:35:40, May 04, 2008 CET
FromPopulistas de Pedernera
ToDebating the Embargo Act
MessageWe don't trade with them anyways.

Date23:40:55, May 04, 2008 CET
FromFrente de Libertação de Vintãli
ToDebating the Embargo Act
MessageStill, we need to send a message to them that they should not be violating political freedoms.

Date13:28:27, May 05, 2008 CET
From(CSA) Gaduridos People's Party (GPP)
ToDebating the Embargo Act
MessageL'olam is technicaly an illegal state because it seized Beiteynu land.

Date00:02:01, May 06, 2008 CET
FromFrente de Libertação de Vintãli
ToDebating the Embargo Act
MessageBeiteynu seized the land first. Originally, the land was the indigenous peoples' land, which Beiteynu took without their consent. L'olam is simply taking it back from the thieves.
And even if it was illegal, still that is not a justification for taking away human rights.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 81

no
    

Total Seats: 328

abstain
 

Total Seats: 91


Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "We shall fight against them, throw them in prisons and destroy them." - Vladimir Putin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50