We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty of Calpicosa
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2114
Description[?]:
| Treaty signed between the governments of Beluzia and Luthori. 1. Beluzia and Luthori will have no tariffs between directly traded goods between our two nations. 2. Protectionist ideologies within and outside of our nations shall be condemned. 3. Beluzia and Luthori shall guarantee the independence of one another in the event of war. 4. Both governments establish similar (in percentage) fishing quotas. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:33:49, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | you should have let tis be discussed! this is a disgrace! |
| Date | 22:41:51, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | I'm voting no because this wasn't discussed first. Re submit it if you like but I think this needs more thought than 5 lines so I urge everyone to vote no. |
| Date | 02:28:54, September 19, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | It is a proposal, as the minister I made the negotiations, if you disapprove of it then vote no, I am sure that would look great to our eastern neighbors... |
| Date | 15:45:57, September 19, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | It is up for discussion now so what exactly are your concerns? |
| Date | 18:44:34, September 19, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | Your first comment is an abomination. I think we should discuss this and then we will have a better treaty that will further benefit us and Luthori... Take three out because it is a waste of time and needs more indepth developement than one line. This is just about free trade not anyhting else - that can come later. For other things in more depth I'll draft up later... |
| Date | 02:19:11, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | Come up with a full ammendment, Luthori has already passed this to change it we will need a better proposal in order for an agreement to take place. |
| Date | 19:12:40, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | Ach pants I couldn't care less - just pass it... |
| Date | 01:59:33, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | The Commonwealth Parliament of Luthori passed this unilaterally with a couple of minor amendments. I'm sure any further changes proposed by your parliament won't be a problem. |
| Date | 06:34:10, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty of Calpicosa |
| Message | As the Minister, by and with the consent of the Parliament of the Beluzian Republic, I declare the Treaty of Calpicosa to be voted upon. This treaty has been created in conjunction with the government of Luthori. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 341 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 59 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right.” --H.L. Mencken |