Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 03:53:27
Server time: 08:06:32, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | Svet-Aldegar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2573

Details

Submitted by[?]: Scientific Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2574

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:05:17, May 10, 2008 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2573
MessageSame one as last time (unless I made a mistake), but giving the JINP's seat to UJDP, because JINP voted against the last one.

Date04:20:01, May 10, 2008 CET
From Party for a Federal Meritocracy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2573
MessageNot sure about the system here, but you might want to pull your votes back on the other one. I suspect that if it passes after this one (which these can) it might take affect and replace this one.

Date12:31:32, May 10, 2008 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2573
MessageWell, I would actually even prefer the other one as it is slightly more representative, but it won't pass, and this is almost as good.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 281

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 69


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49