Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 01:15:11
Server time: 10:44:48, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): TH081 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Replacing a Supreme Court Justice(second proposal)

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2575

Description[?]:

It has been a concern of many parties about Justices being biased. The following proposal will deal with it.

1- Any party holding a Supreme Court seat who brings up a case to it or acts as defendant, may recuse themselves from the proceedings and make a temporary appointment to fill in for that case.

2- The Justice selected will be named Acting Supreme Court Justice and will only serve for that specific case.

3- The Justice would have to be from another party in order to ensure neutrality.

4- The party holding the seat decides whether or nor they should recuse from the proceeeding and they select the party that will substitute them for that case.

This bill will pass with supermajority of 100 votes or more.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:01:19, May 11, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Replacing a Supreme Court Justice(second proposal)
MessageThis bill is going to fail again, so I won't propose it anymore.

Date23:42:35, May 11, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Replacing a Supreme Court Justice(second proposal)
MessageYeah it will fall, but it would be nice if the parties voting no could say what they object in the bill

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 80

no
   

Total Seats: 54

abstain
 

Total Seats: 16


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 43