Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 01:04:35
Server time: 02:55:24, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Investigation into bribery scheme

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2594

Description[?]:

The Liberal Party has just learned that a member of Parliament was involved in a bribery scheme. An investigation was not conducted as far as we know. We would like to know if an investigation was conducted and if it hasn't, it should begin now.

March 2573
News Report
The United Republics of Lodamun is in an uproar, as a member of the Parliament of Free Peoples was implicated in a bribery scheme. The well-known politician Kurt Jones was seen accepting illegal funds from Frans Jones, head of TXK Inc., in return for favorable conditions for TXK Inc., helping them rise to the top of the Medicine sector.


The Liberal Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:43:36, May 15, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
Messageis Kurt Jones a LP member?

Date19:28:43, May 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageNo, he is not. But we just found out about it and we want an investigation on it. Parliament members who accept bribes are a disgrace to this country.

Date19:37:14, May 15, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageBased on LP actions concerning the Defense contract, I would suspect he is an LP member.

Date19:49:56, May 15, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageWell which party does Kurt Jones belong too?

Date01:54:31, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageIf he was an LP member, our party would'nt have brought it up. The investigation we request is to determine what party he was from.

Date05:37:47, May 16, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI'm saying it makes sense based on the LP record.

Date06:20:27, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageThis is not joke URP. Please take this very seriously. Let's leave those kinds of comments aside for a while and work on finding out whose party Kurt Jones is from and if he received proper punishment for his actions.

Date06:51:43, May 16, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
Message*** I don't think you understand - these stories crop up in the newspaper randomly. It's up to us to decide what party he's in if we're going to acknowledge it at all. For example, years ago an article appeared announcing Jonathan Roberts won the International Soccer Championship. I decided to make him a URP cabinet minister and now he serves as President of the NSCL. I think it makes sense for Jones to be an LP member especially since I recently questioned your decision to grant a huge no-bid contract.

Date07:06:29, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI know they do but this time I don't want any controversy in my party. It seems I am always in the middle of everything. I was looking to blame someone else this time, it can't always be me.

Date11:50:18, May 16, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageWell as far as the rp go you cant just create a new person for another party, and if you do the other party can ignore the person you create since its not one they created to speak for there party.

And it would also be official which party he belonged to, the members of the parliament are not kept secret.

Date19:21:43, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI know I can't create for someone but I was hoping someone would be generous to take him, don't you think? I can simply delete this debate and leave it alone.

Date19:28:52, May 16, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageNah I like this, and this would be fun if someone takes it

Date19:50:02, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageYes, it would. But the question is, who is going to volunteer?

Date20:42:44, May 16, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageWhy did the LP even bring this up? As a way to bash another party? This charcter obviously fits the pattern of Liberal corruption. If the LP is unwilling to accept this, it should just drop the matter.

Date20:48:27, May 16, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI am not going to take the blame this time. As you can see, I asked for a volunteer or I would drop this. I am going to drop it whenever I feel like it, got it?

Date08:49:05, May 17, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageJust delete this bill then.

Date21:12:11, May 17, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageYou didn't get it, did you? I'll do it when I want to.

Date05:28:09, May 18, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageDon't you have enough garbage blocking meaningful debate? When are you going to post Telamon Crisis VII?

Date05:50:16, May 18, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageActually is #4.

Date07:20:10, May 21, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI'll volunteer, so what do I do to set this up?

Date18:35:07, May 21, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageJust claim Kurt Jones as a member of your party, and then someone else can call for a investigation

Date04:11:57, May 22, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageKurt Jones is a member of my party, in fact he's minster of health and social services.

Date13:47:31, May 22, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageHow can he be that? The current minister of that department is a LP member, and in the new cabinet proposel a MP official has been nominated for that post

Date03:18:23, May 24, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
Message(I worded it wrong the money was so he could be nominated and elected for that position)

Date07:21:57, May 28, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageInteresting. Well, I guess an investigation has to be conducted.

Date07:50:26, May 28, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageI don't think anyone's interested.

Date14:03:02, May 30, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageYou are not interested. Since you are not interest, why don't you stop posting here and go somewhere else.

Date21:24:37, May 30, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageWhy don't you cry like a little baby?

Date03:00:58, May 31, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageBecause I am not you.

Date05:02:03, May 31, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
Message*rolls eyes

Date22:31:15, June 07, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessagePut this up for vote so we can access through a different page.

Date23:20:30, June 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Investigation into bribery scheme
MessageSorry about this. I meant to delete it instead of putting it up for vote. I guess we can make this a condemnation of the acts committed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 141

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 9


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 83