We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2576
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2577
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the United Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Progessive Labour Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Constitutional Monarchy Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the tory
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the tory
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Constitutional Monarchy Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the tory
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:00:40, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2576 |
Message | Not a great incentive for me to support i'm afraid... I rather like having Foreign Affairs. (Your first Cabinet always fails! It took me around 5 attempts to please everyone) |
Date | 18:19:32, May 15, 2008 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2576 |
Message | yes, new parties nearly always try to form new cabinets unsuccessfully. Have a look at my first attempt! http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=4894 |
Date | 19:09:45, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2576 |
Message | Heres mine, I tried the same as you. But you soon realise that the fewer parties that are included, the better the Government. http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=117669 |
Date | 19:35:37, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2576 |
Message | Why are you giving foreign affairs and finance to a new party? |
Date | 19:37:17, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2576 |
Message | Perhaps "Tory" think they can do a better job? :-/ I argue not! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 259 | |||
no | Total Seats: 179 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 312 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "When women are depressed, they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another country. It's a whole different way of thinking." - Elaine Boosler |