Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:46:49
Server time: 07:13:10, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Boot Strap Act of 2577

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party (ZC)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2577

Description[?]:

The Federal government provides all our nationals with a basic income if not supported by another person. This statement is very hard for the N.F.C. to get it's collective head around. What is to drive people into the work-force or the military or continuing their education to obtain a better job. Why is it that this governments position is that we are universal employers of all those who do not wish to work. It is the citizens mandate to provide taxes not for their government to pay them for doing absolutely nothing.

Signed,
A. H. Thamion, Minister of Finance

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:19:04, May 17, 2008 CET
From Democratic Trade Unionist Party
ToDebating the Boot Strap Act of 2577
MessageWhat for those who have no job prospects? Or those who cannot work? The infirm, mentally ill and those failed by the state? Have you no humanity?

Date11:27:30, May 17, 2008 CET
From Saiserist League
ToDebating the Boot Strap Act of 2577
MessageNo.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 484

no
  

Total Seats: 116

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48