Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 02:24:38
Server time: 17:35:21, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | burgerboys | Nileowen_Kir | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Vice-President Nomination

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2579

Description[?]:

I hereby nominate Kathy McKinley (GGP) to the Office of the Vice-President of the United Republics of Lodamun.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:17:33, May 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageI will not put it up for debate because it seems only URP,LLP, and myself debate this things.

Date19:21:50, May 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageDoes the parties voting no mind telling me why they are opposing this nomination? Some of you are always crying that the same people are holding power, I tried to change it, and you vote no.

Date20:09:51, May 19, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageWell I vote no because I dont support the policies the GGP stand for. I have the lowest join voting record with the GGP of all parties, with only 37%. Although they are not the party I vote against the most, I am the party who votes with them the least times

Date20:15:03, May 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageYou know that the VP does not have many powers, right?

Date21:07:51, May 19, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageAnd? What does that have to with anything? I will not support someone I disagree with that much to any office like that.

Date21:11:28, May 19, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageAny relation to McKinley Vandevere, head of the URP?

Date21:11:34, May 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageJust making sure that you knew.

Date23:02:09, May 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageI don't think so.

OOC: Your leader came after the nomination

Date05:19:53, May 20, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Vice-President Nomination
MessageOOC: I used a name generator.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 63

no
   

Total Seats: 73

abstain
 

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55