Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:42:01
Server time: 21:17:58, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Arusu-Weareback | Autokrator30 | hexaus18 | Sevenberry | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Safety for our Citizens! Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Aloria United

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2114

Description[?]:

Our current policy for civil defence is great - we currently allocate the responsibility for building and maintaining shelters to local authorities. Why not take this one step further, though, and make the private sector ensure the safety of its workers, and the public at large. We propose that all large (greater than 2000 square metres in ground area size) private buildings must have capacity for underground civil defence. In the event of an earthquake, a volcano, or plenty of other disasters, these shelters will save lives.

However, since this is likely to be costly to implement retrospectively, not to mention difficult (for some buildings, impossible), we propose this law to only concern new buildings, not those currently existing.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:49:07, September 21, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Safety for our Citizens! Bill
MessageNeither the current nuclear, biological nor chemical threat is high enough to warrant this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 288

abstain
   

Total Seats: 112


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 42