We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical and Biological Weapons Protection ACt
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2114
Description[?]:
| We should not leave a country that attacks us with chemical weapons unscaved. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:06:48, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Homaseksical Party | To | Debating the Chemical and Biological Weapons Protection ACt |
| Message | I wonder what "unscaved" means. Could it be related to the word "unscathed" in any way? *cough* |
| Date | 21:21:15, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Chemical and Biological Weapons Protection ACt |
| Message | OOC: sorry, I was typing quickly, I didn't have much time to get all these bills up. |
| Date | 23:00:06, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Aloria United | To | Debating the Chemical and Biological Weapons Protection ACt |
| Message | Biological weapons. Great. So when someone attacks us with smallpox, even in a limited way, the best defence would be to attack back with Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever? I don't think so. Chances are, both sides will end up with infections on both sides. And an attack with smallpox would spread like wildfire around the world. If we agree to this bill, we really have to agree to a change in our stance from "we won't develop and stockpile chem and bio weapons" to one where we will, otherwise this bill is null and void - and do we really want to give our assent to the proliferationf of chem and bio weapons? |
| Date | 23:02:19, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Aloria United | To | Debating the Chemical and Biological Weapons Protection ACt |
| Message | Apologies - our current status on chem and bio weapons is that we DO develop and stockpile them. I thought the other bill had passed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 165 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 123 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 112 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |