Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:31:18
Server time: 08:28:41, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Carrier naming

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2581

Description[?]:

Since we are running out of presidents from the second republic to use to name carriers, I ask parliament to ammend the rules to allow for naming air carriers after presidents from the first republic too. They all got democraticly elected in there time, and I dont see a reason why we should keep to only naming them after second republic presidents.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:42:24, May 23, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageI told URRA that if we are going to build the carriers in a 20 year period. We don't need the 10 names now, in the future (20 years), there are probably going to be new names available. My guess is about 4 or 5 names.

Date19:56:11, May 23, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageI dont think we should just name them after presidents who recently died, we should name them after some of the first presidents too, they deserve the honor just as much as more recent presidents.

Date19:57:45, May 23, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageI really don't care, names are names. You can argue what you want with URRA. I really don't care about the names. The fact is that we don't know if the contratcs are going to pass.

Date20:13:45, May 23, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageThere is no need for as many carriers as the LP proposes.

Date20:14:05, May 23, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageThis is not about the contracts, but setting a general policy on carrier names

Date20:18:16, May 23, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageI believe a new class of carrier should be built. Then you can mess with the naming all you want.

Date21:07:40, May 23, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageIf no one actually cares I will just put this up for a vote then, and hope that unless parties specificly oppose this they will pass this

Date21:08:01, May 23, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageSo if you dont care please just vote to pass this

Date21:11:24, May 23, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageSince names are just that names, I don't see the point of voting yes or no but I'll vote "yes" because it is a longer word than "no."

Date22:11:43, May 23, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Carrier naming
MessageI just want to formalize mainly because I want to name a ship after the nations first president

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 112

no
 

Total Seats: 27

abstain
 

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family." - Saul Alinsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56