We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Carrier naming
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2581
Description[?]:
Since we are running out of presidents from the second republic to use to name carriers, I ask parliament to ammend the rules to allow for naming air carriers after presidents from the first republic too. They all got democraticly elected in there time, and I dont see a reason why we should keep to only naming them after second republic presidents. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:42:24, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | I told URRA that if we are going to build the carriers in a 20 year period. We don't need the 10 names now, in the future (20 years), there are probably going to be new names available. My guess is about 4 or 5 names. |
Date | 19:56:11, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | I dont think we should just name them after presidents who recently died, we should name them after some of the first presidents too, they deserve the honor just as much as more recent presidents. |
Date | 19:57:45, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | I really don't care, names are names. You can argue what you want with URRA. I really don't care about the names. The fact is that we don't know if the contratcs are going to pass. |
Date | 20:18:16, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | I believe a new class of carrier should be built. Then you can mess with the naming all you want. |
Date | 21:07:40, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | If no one actually cares I will just put this up for a vote then, and hope that unless parties specificly oppose this they will pass this |
Date | 21:11:24, May 23, 2008 CET |
From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Carrier naming | Message | Since names are just that names, I don't see the point of voting yes or no but I'll vote "yes" because it is a longer word than "no." |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 112 |
no | Total Seats: 27 |
abstain | Total Seats: 11 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family." - Saul Alinsky |