Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 02:49:38
Server time: 05:10:21, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military appointments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2582

Description[?]:

Just another standard phase out of the top military command

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: General Pete Downsby

Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Admiral Gerorge Stuart

Army Chief of Staff: General John Olliver

Army Vice-Chief of Staff: General Michael Scofield

Airforce Chief of Staff: General Theodor Roswell

Airforce Vice-Chief of Staff: General Mathias Rowley

Chief of Naval Operations: Admiral Clarck Sollsby

Vice-Chief of Naval Operations: Admiral Jonathan Bell

Commandant of the Marine Strike Force: General Alexander Moss

Vice-Commandant of the Marine Strike Force: Lieutenant General James Kirkwood

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:29:12, May 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageThey were just changed. Just because you descriminate against women, it doesn't mean there is a need chang of them.

Date20:42:46, May 25, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageI dont descriminate against women. You where the one who mentioned gender when you appointed.
Also this is so that the military personell is the presidents RP characters

Date20:53:31, May 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageI don't mind giving them to you, but there is no need to change them.

Date21:42:21, May 25, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageI make my characters, you make yours.

Date21:43:16, May 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageThen I will keep voting no for this nonsense.

Date22:01:38, May 25, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageIts just a standard miltary phase out. If you win the next election you can nominate whoever you want to, and I will support it

Date22:24:13, May 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageI understand about the RP thing but if I am willing to give them to you. They were confirmed less than six months ago. It is not the same as a cabinet, it is the military, they don't take sides.

Date23:10:23, May 25, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military appointments
MessageYeah I know, but the military is all RP, so I would like my won RP characters when I am president. The only nomination you made that I dident agree with was the army vice-chief, for reasons I stated when you nominated them, the rest where fine with me.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 91

no
 

Total Seats: 28

abstain
 

Total Seats: 31


Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others.

Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49