We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, November 2581
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: February 2583
Description[?]:
| We, the The Liberal Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:02:40, May 25, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | Along with impeachment. |
| Date | 03:56:26, May 26, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | We support the President. I don't understand how managing the Executive branch is illegal exactly if the LLP controls said ministries. I agree that the PFP should examine such actions closely, however given some of the radical claims made by the LP such as imagined authority to wiretap, siege Lodamese cities, etc. we think this bill is very humorous indeed. |
| Date | 04:06:01, May 26, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | The LLP does not control any Ministries, they are not part of the cabinet. If you have a problem with what I have done why haven't you done something. Right, you can't, becuse they are not illegal. |
| Date | 05:45:31, May 26, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | Is there really a point to debating you? It's like debating with a wall. - A stupid wall |
| Date | 06:03:02, May 26, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | I say the same thing to you but your wall is also stubborn and retarded. |
| Date | 02:39:37, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | If you vote for the impeachment, you should vote for this. |
| Date | 02:47:54, May 27, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | This really should have been in the same bill then. |
| Date | 03:11:19, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 2581 |
| Message | One doesn't come with the other. That's why we have a line of sucession for. This is simply an option. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 81 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 17 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines |