We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Supporters of Science in Design (IP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2583
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1024">Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. This treaty will not apply if we would be forced to attack a fellow Axis country, so long as we are in the AAT. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:00:29, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty |
Message | The Maharaja's Foreign Affairs Minister has been working with representatives from Luthori to forge an alliance. We are glad to see it come to fruition. |
Date | 03:37:50, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty |
Message | I will say this, as I said to the government of Luthori, this treaty threatens our security. Everyday our commercial ships go through those waters and the presence of military ships is threating. I suggest Malivia not to ratify this treaty. Rich Reynolds Minister of Foreign Affairs United Republics of Lodamun |
Date | 04:10:27, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty |
Message | Unlike the Three Nations treaty this treaty does not cause hostility to commercial ships. Indeed, we already have naval ships in those waters, so there will be no change in that regards. |
Date | 04:28:17, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty |
Message | We only want a guarantee that our commercial ships and out trading routes will be safe from any interference. If that guarantee is given, we have no problems with this treaty but I hope you can undertand the source of my worry. Rich Reynolds Minister of Foreign Affairs United Republics of Lodamun |
Date | 04:53:24, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Christian Royalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Luthori, Malivia, Valruzian Naval and Military Treaty |
Message | We are pleased by the warm reception. We will work with our nation's leaders to quickly ratify this treaty. Steven P. Kenendy IV Head of State Holy Luthori Empire |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 500 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle |