We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Naval Defense Contract
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2583
Description[?]:
| As promised, the bidding for the contract lasted for one year. Some bids were posted and Strcker Naval Technology, Inc. offered the best bid 210 billion LOD for 5 years. The contract can be found here. http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=195087 This bill will be submitted for vote. A YES vote is to approve teh contract, a NO vote is to disapprove the contract. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:22:34, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | I encourage everyone to vote for this renovation of our navy. |
| Date | 11:39:29, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | I woud like to propose this names for the carriers: LNS Tyler LNS Laird LNS Harkness LNS Delphiki LNS Porter LNS Bramble LNS Davis LNS Lannings LNS Douglas LNS November |
| Date | 21:50:24, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | Sounds good. |
| Date | 22:22:32, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | We have to pay them 210 billion over 5 y0ears? Because thats 4.2 billion LOD a year, from a already pressed defense budget, and in addition you want to add the 3.5 billion a year cost for the missile defence |
| Date | 22:32:17, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | We don't have to pay them all the money in 5 years, they are going to make everything in 5 years. We can pay them in 10, 20, 50 years if we want to. Of course, we need to give them some money while they are making all of the ships and missiles. |
| Date | 22:49:16, May 27, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | Dident the original contract include a 50 year downpayment period? 5 years is a bit short, so we should try to negotiate to give us a bit more time to pay back, so we wont have too pay soo much each year, but can take the cost gradually over the years |
| Date | 23:07:33, May 27, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Naval Defense Contract |
| Message | I already told you how it is. The contract is going to be done in 5 years, but it doesn't mean we have to pay in 5 years. We can pay it in 25 or 30 years. Something agreed to by the corporation a long time ago. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 107 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 17 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 26 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy |