We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Curfew policy.

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Paradox Theory

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2585

Description^[?]:

Proposed: Minors may not use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.

Curfew hours 11pm to 5am

Proposal^[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).

Old value:: No curfew policies may be established.

Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.

Proposed: Minors may not use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	02:10:56, May 31, 2008 CET
From	Lodamun Libertarian Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	Thats way to early for starting a curfew. Especially on weekends. But offcourse we oppose curfews in general so that wont have any say in our vote

Date	05:06:58, May 31, 2008 CET
From	The Liberal Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	Is there even a need for a curfew? Do we have any problems?

Date	05:12:37, May 31, 2008 CET
From	United Republics Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	I believe there is. LP proposed a law that education is only required to age 17, yet those under 18 cannot work. Therefore it's reasonable to assume that these idle youths have nothing to do except stir up trouble on the streets.

Date	05:27:31, May 31, 2008 CET
From	The Liberal Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	They can have fun. Present credible facts, not just opinions. Opinions do not mean anything. As for the law, it passed with a majority, that's all it needs.

Date	08:04:05, May 31, 2008 CET
From	United Republics Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	I presented facts. The fact is that we have teenagers with nothing to do. It's logical that they will cause trouble. The LP are simply unwilling to accept these FACTS because of its own numerous short-sighted policies.

Date	08:07:33, May 31, 2008 CET
From	The Liberal Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	Do you have any evidence that they are causing trouble? Not logic, facts. Show me the evidence and I will believe you.

Date	08:50:21, May 31, 2008 CET
From	United Republics Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	*** You have no idea how particracy works. Just leave.

Date	21:05:50, May 31, 2008 CET
From	The Liberal Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	Are you so afraid of me? Obviously you can't take me, that's why you are crying for me to leave.

Date	03:11:56, June 01, 2008 CET
From	United Republics Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	The fact is that there is no way to prove 99% of things in particracy, but I presented a logical case. Good roleplaying requires you to accept this or at least make a case as to why I'm wrong. The fact is that you lack any knowledge on the basic concepts of particracy and are best ignored.

Date	10:09:44, June 01, 2008 CET
From	The Liberal Party
To	Debating the Curfew policy.
Message	If you had skills roleplaying, you would have proved your point of view. It is a shame that after being in this game for so long, you still haven't learned how to properly roleplay. I can teach you if you want to learn.

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 28

Total Seats: 58

abstain

Total Seats: 64

Random fact: Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old and have no currently ratified members.

Random quote: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67