Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 01:01:23
Server time: 10:58:36, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unity Government for Hobrazia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Hobrazia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2588

Description[?]:

Desiring a government that represents all pro-Hobrazian political voices in the Imperial Chamber, the Emperor Elect is hereby instructed to convene a cabinet meeting with the following distribution of ministries.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:37:27, June 05, 2008 CET
From Liberal Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageA unity government in time of war can only function if it represents the voice of all Hobrazian patriots.

Date09:23:07, June 05, 2008 CET
From People's Liberation Front of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageThe CPH (PFDS) is proud not to be participating in this bourgeoise cabal of a cabinet.

Date10:52:10, June 05, 2008 CET
From Hobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageWe would very much like to know what foreign policy both the LPoH and the CPoH (PFDS) is interested in having as this is basically the assignments for the cabinet at this important moment in history.

Date01:16:25, June 06, 2008 CET
From Liberal Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageThat doesn't make any sense. Could you clarify.

Date15:56:59, June 06, 2008 CET
From Hobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageWe would like to know which kind of foreign policy the parties have.

More specific we think of the war in Darnussia, who to support?
The conflict bewteen Luthori and Ikadron/Dundorf?
The Three Nation Council?
Lodamun?
The threats against Keymon?
Beiteynu?
Malivia?

Do the mentioned parties have a policy on these matters, because that is what the government is all about at this moment. This will clarify for the HPP whether we can support this cabinet or not. Also we request the policies of the CPoH as we would maybe consider suggesting a place in the cabinet for them.

Hope i clarified it. :-)

Date20:03:36, June 06, 2008 CET
From People's Liberation Front of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageOur policy is not to get involved in squabbling nations' disputes and wars, but to protect the liberty, democracy and national independence of all countries.

We would not be interested in joining this cabinet, however, as the LPH is participating (btw what does the Liberal Party prefer, LPoH or LPH? I will use whichever you prefer in the future).

Date20:05:26, June 06, 2008 CET
From People's Liberation Front of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
MessageWe want to add to our above comment the reason: the LPH is the most radically economically liberal and capitalist party in the Imperial Chamber. The FPH and the CNP at least support a social welfare state, as far as I have understood it, and state involvement in to some extent, but the LPH clearly goes far beyond all other Hobrazian parties when it comes to smashing the institutions that protect the Hobrazian proletarian and peasant majority.

Date02:50:08, June 07, 2008 CET
From Liberal Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Unity Government for Hobrazia
Message((I prefer just "Liberals" if possible))

We don't have a serious foreign policy, and will support the status quo. That's why we kept the WSS!P as foreign minister even though they're the smallest party.

We will be extremely unhappy if this cabinet does not go through. You can not deny the obligations of democracy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 155

no
  

Total Seats: 145

abstain
  

Total Seats: 100


Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

Random quote: "In this age, the man who dares to think for himself and to act independently does a service to his race" - John Stuart Mill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69