We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.188.2587
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2588
Description[?]:
| Freedom of expression, whatever form it may take, is a fundamental civil and Human right. It is ludicrous to allow any level of the government, be that municipal, state or Federal to tell people that they are not allowed this right. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Current: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:25:27, June 06, 2008 CET | From |  Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.188.2587 |
| Message | The Federal Government already tells people that they DO NOT HAVE ABSOLUTE FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION. There's no need to pretend like governments don't have the right to regulate what kind of public behavior is appropriate, when the Socialists are already so keen to place limitations on acceptable public behavior. |
| Date | 17:05:38, June 06, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the DSP.188.2587 |
| Message | That the DSP, one of the major aggressors on the civil liberties, dares to take a "greater-than-thou" attitude on this matter is absolutely abhorrent. The very idea of trying to call the local governments into question when the federal government under their leadership has shown to be restrictive is a slap in the face to common sense, not to mention any thought of being a decent people. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 301 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 214 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "There is no problem that cannot be solved with diplomacy or debate. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not need a gun, but a direct ride to a mental health clinic." - Ascentio Cartaginese, former Istalian politician |