Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:21:25
Server time: 16:38:34, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Lab47AU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of July 2587

Details

Submitted by[?]: Brabantic Freedom Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2588

Description[?]:

The Brabantic Freedom Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Free Federation of Zardugal.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:39:00, June 07, 2008 CET
From Saiserist League
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2587
MessageWhy must we cut Trade and Industry, and Infrastructure? Those are the ones that have bumped up th GDP with so much bang for our buck. By cutting them you will actually end up taking money out of people's pockets.

Date13:17:41, June 07, 2008 CET
From Brabantic Freedom Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2587
Messagewere can I cut?
I'm trying to make the total = 1,000,000,000,000 ZAR
the rest of the money will come from tax.

Date15:14:50, June 07, 2008 CET
From Saiserist League
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2587
Message"Well you've caught me in a bind here. I tried to craft the budget based on percentages. Here's the issue:

Cutting Defense is fundamentally not a good idea.
All the areas from Infrastructure to Trade all give boosts to the economy by proper expenditue in those areas. The GDP increases with increases in those areas up to a certain point, then the rate of increase falls off. I was trying to use percentages to strike the best possible balance. That's why our GDP jumped 1,000 ZAR for every 550 ZAR in increased expenditure.
Finance is a more important area than is readily apparent. Finance is what determines tax collection, so with increases in Finance we collect more from our income taxes, thus reducing our need to raise taxes to make up the difference.

There really is no perfect solution. The budget is a vast, complex, interdependent formula, and I personally thought we had it about right under the Second Kalinyev Plan. We cen defer to your judgement."

~Mikhail Kalinyev, Saiserist economics expert

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 325

no
   

Total Seats: 210

abstain
 

Total Seats: 65


Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

Random quote: "Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred." - Martin Luther King Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 47