Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 03:27:26
Server time: 00:32:33, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): BMsellar | friedrich3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: TSDRP

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2589

Description[?]:

The last to be proposed before we lock it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:15:38, June 09, 2008 CET
From Obshestvo Stroiteley Terri
ToDebating the The Cabinet
MessageThe fraction of Dzentlmeni Udachi left the Duma. We do not want to take part in colonization of Trigunia by Hutori aristocrats.

Date03:47:26, June 10, 2008 CET
From Family and Tradition Party (disbanded)
ToDebating the The Cabinet
MessageWe would like to see our good allies, the Christian Conservative Party, have some cabinet positions, and we are dissapointed that they have not been offered any.
However, as a strategic move, as this cabinet is in our parties interests, we will accept. We would like to let the CCP know that we do not vote for this cabinet with any wish to exclude them - quite the contrary. We would very much like to share cabinet with them in future.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 418

no
 

Total Seats: 52

abstain
  

Total Seats: 85


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Unlike the world of free-markets, in political government when some individuals win, other individuals lose." - Robert Klassen

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58