We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2590
Description[?]:
| BECAUSE how do you plan to actually enforce a ban on making out or suggestive dancing in public? THEREFORE, we propose the repeal of this archaic, ridiculously morally Victorian and unKanjoran law from the books. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:19:13, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | I see the BLK calls it un-Kanjorian and Victorian because they are trying to find a term so that they can easily denounce it without having to use some argument strategy to denounce it. |
| Date | 03:54:40, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | But it is. Such moral restrictions of something this natural has no place in this nation and this century, let alone any species. |
| Date | 04:33:11, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Any species? No I can tell you that humans do care about the implications of their public society and do limit this act. |
| Date | 06:14:27, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | I fail to see how kissing or dancing or an embrace in any way "implicate public society". This is just completely unnecessary conservativism beyond any common sense or logic. |
| Date | 07:18:10, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Well because the implicit acts of people in public should not be recognized as appropriate. In public that is. If a person wants to stage sexually implicit acts in their counsel then they may do so. However the acts of a mass in a public square should not form the ideals of Kanjor. |
| Date | 07:24:19, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Républicain de Gauche | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | M. Sauvais, Président of the Parti Radicale, confesses that yes, he has already passionately kissed someone in public and yes, at the moment, it was a very nice thing to do. |
| Date | 07:58:39, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | I cannot understand what on Terra the PCR is talking about nor can I understand their line of reasoning. That's not a point, that's a bunch of words threaded together. |
| Date | 08:09:38, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | You have a habit of getting off the subject and start categorizing people and their actions and then denouncing them in your own nonconstructive way. It's really sad. |
| Date | 21:36:23, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | "Well because the implicit acts of people in public should not be recognized as appropriate. In public that is. If a person wants to stage sexually implicit acts in their counsel then they may do so. However the acts of a mass in a public square should not form the ideals of Kanjor." Tell us, if you please, how that makes any sense at all? |
| Date | 21:37:30, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | I also fail to see how two individuals kissing or dancing in public somehow equates to a mass orgy in a public square. |
| Date | 22:02:12, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Do your stuff in private. The public square should not be a showpoint. Kanjor is a conservative society and the public square should not be a place of where more indecent acts can be committed. |
| Date | 22:56:57, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Kanjor was a liberal society for centuries. This conservativism is just a temporary reactionary period. |
| Date | 22:57:35, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Kanjor was a liberal society for centuries. This conservativism is just a temporary reactionary period. |
| Date | 22:58:02, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | OOC: Double-posting error there. |
| Date | 23:05:38, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Parti Libertaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | We'd expect nothing less from the conservative scum on the right side of the Senat. It is a shame their insanity has fooled the Kanjoran people for so long, such that they allow our govenment to oppress them in such ludicrous ways. What's next? No more eating wheat on thursdays? |
| Date | 00:05:43, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | No wheat, huh? Hmmm. |
| Date | 00:33:00, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | Hmmm... No wheat on Thursdays? We can't figure out the logic in that. Oh well say PDCK sounds like something we "conservative scum" can ban, correct? lol Anyways due to your language and attitudes no wonder why the people are turning away from your progressive fascism. |
| Date | 04:40:43, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | So, you're going to ban us? |
| Date | 05:03:23, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | To | Debating the Proposition BL80 - Expositions Publiques d'Affection |
| Message | No they think "conservative scum" such as ourselves are going to ban everything and anything in sight. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 225 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 172 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |