Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 03:06:45
Server time: 12:53:14, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | echizen | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Brendan Nelson

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2625

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Islam Plus: Military. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:59:14, June 12, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageWell, if you ratify this, then you won't be able to amend the military section and you shall slowly observe your military visibility disappear...

Date13:54:59, June 12, 2008 CET
FromLibertarian Approach
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageYes. This is the problem I have with the Islam Plus treaty.

As much as The Divine Fist loves the prospect, we need visibility.

Date05:24:17, June 13, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageYou can sustain current policies even without treaties.

Date07:16:50, June 13, 2008 CET
FromFree Brendan Nelson
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageStop undermining our plans for world domination!

Date11:47:23, June 14, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageI just love criticizing you....:)

Date03:27:16, June 15, 2008 CET
FromLaborers' Opportunities League Dćltársky
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageWe also just love not hearing from a party that doesn't exist.

Date05:48:15, June 15, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageOOC: Commie, nice name for a party but I think there's a problem: "Pogressive"

Date11:52:59, June 16, 2008 CET
FromLaborers' Opportunities League Dćltársky
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageOH, shit, Eric, you just got pwned.

Date13:07:16, June 19, 2008 CET
FromLudová Deltárska Milícia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageWait, Commie is Eric?

Mind = blown

Date13:44:53, June 19, 2008 CET
FromLaborers' Opportunities League Dćltársky
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageNo you fool. "Commie" as in the username, not CPK

Date14:33:51, June 20, 2008 CET
FromFree Brendan Nelson
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageSVENSKA TIGER

Date07:16:13, July 27, 2008 CET
FromLudová Deltárska Milícia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageWe need this shiz ratified

Now

Date10:44:00, July 27, 2008 CET
FromLaborers' Opportunities League Dćltársky
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
Messagenou

Date09:56:59, August 13, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessagePlease, propose or delete this.

Date07:03:23, August 14, 2008 CET
FromLaborers' Opportunities League Dćltársky
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
Messagenou

Date08:57:32, August 21, 2008 CET
FromFree Brendan Nelson
ToDebating the Ratification of the Islam Plus: Military
MessageIn compliance with the KFG's rude and arrogant (read Hellenic) request.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 169

no
    

Total Seats: 144

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72