Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:30:07
Server time: 19:29:52, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): AethanKal | HopesFor | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Respect for Life Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Plowshare Collective

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2591

Description[?]:

the Plowshare Collective insists that the sacred nature of human and non-human life be acknowledged and respected by the government and people of Al'Badara.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:10:23, June 12, 2008 CET
FromEnlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageHm...

Alright.

Date19:06:43, June 12, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageNo, sorry, this goes too far, we are not lovey dovey fluffy bunnies

Date00:04:54, June 13, 2008 CET
FromPlowshare Collective
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
Messagethe state has no claim over the lives of its citizens - it exists to serve them, not to dominate them. there's nothing fluffy about insisting on the sovereign rights of individuals, the foremost of which is life itself.

Date06:42:41, June 13, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary Party
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageAbsolute Support

Date12:26:02, June 13, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageActually... we do. They voted us into office, and we shall carry out that office as we see fit. We are accountable, if they don't like it, they'll vote us out. Things like letting in all refugees and just releasing prisoners of war is sheer lunacy

Date17:08:33, June 13, 2008 CET
FromEnlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageOOC:^ Eviilll! Eviillll!! ^

Date01:40:00, June 14, 2008 CET
FromPlowshare Collective
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageL'État, c'est moi? your generous assumptions regarding your own privileges aside, it's naive to assume that powers granted to your office will not be abused by its next holder. either way, we are unconvinced that it is ethically responsible to accept hierarchical power even with the consent of the oppressed. a people used to its chains and well indoctrinated will "willingly" submit to slavery. that is no excuse to oppose emancipation. democracy without absolute equality is a farce.

Date09:16:49, June 14, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Respect for Life Act
MessageThat's not true at all, a people in slavery, when given the choice, will free themselves (OOC: look at india!). Yes, there may be abuse of powers, but with terms as short as just over two years the legislature is held easily accountable for themselves.

OOC: Look who's talking HKA!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 141

no
  

Total Seats: 187

abstain
    

Total Seats: 387


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening." - Ann Coulter

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 119