We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2592
Description[?]:
| Limit nudity in Sekowan society. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:42:04, June 13, 2008 CET | From |  Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | We do not support. |
| Date | 02:53:49, June 13, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 17:11:52, June 13, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | Why be against raising the standard? Children should be encouraged to lead healthy lives. Research shows that addiction (i.e. pornography) destroys the brain. Do we want to harm our children? |
| Date | 22:46:49, June 13, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | My exact reasoning is quite long and complicated, if you really want to hear it, I'll share. |
| Date | 02:12:44, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | Sure. Go for it. Convince me that it's a good idea to let pornography on television. |
| Date | 11:31:51, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | Support, though we feel this issue would be better localized. |
| Date | 17:48:29, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | OOC: I'm going to do this all OOC sence its longwinded a bit. Like morals and the like, I believe clothing to be a human construct. However, I realize that its so ingrained into us that everyone going nude is not such a good idea. Infact, that seems like a very crazy idea to the vast majority of people. However, I feel people should be able to if they want. If a parent or such person does not want their kids to see it (or themselves) look away, ask them to leave, etc. Harrasment of people who do not wish to participate should not be tolerated, and the definition of "harrasment" will be very broad, as to assure that no one gets offended. (So basicly, if someone is running around nude, and people don't like it, ask them to leave, if they don't, then they can be arrested). As for TV content, I feel it is the parent's responsibility to keep their kinds from watching it. And if an adult doesn't want to see it, then don't watch it. In short, its a combination of parental responsibility and freedom, as long as it is not infringing on other's freedoms. |
| Date | 08:51:29, June 16, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | It is within our opinion that addiction, apart from physical chemical addiction is nothing but an artificial construct of psychologists with to much time on their hands and over opinionated conservative religious persons. |
| Date | 04:35:20, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | You believe that hormones aren't chemicals? Please explain, DSP. I was under the impression that they were. |
| Date | 08:35:44, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0111.2590 Nudity Bill |
| Message | Perhaps the DSP's scientists are of the same caliber as their accountants? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 225 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 302 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 73 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "The political ballot box stands for willingness to be ruled by somebody other than yourself." - Alvin Lowi, Jr. |