Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:34:14
Server time: 17:25:45, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2591

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2592

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:12:55, June 14, 2008 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2591
MessageSorry. We need Science & Technology. Anything else we can take or leave (though we're unlikely to vote for a cabinet that doesn't give us at least our fair share), but we have an irrational need for S&T. It is our favourite.

Date01:06:54, June 15, 2008 CET
From United Reform Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2591
MessageSorry about that, I didn't know.

Date13:35:23, June 15, 2008 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2591
MessageYeah. We could vote for something like this, as long as it gave us Science & Technology (and we would actually suggest giving Head of Government to PFM, the largest of the parties represented in the cabinet, as is relatively traditional). But PFM probably wouldn't vote yes, and we wouldn't vote for a Cabinet that excluded only them, so the point may be moot.

Date16:12:19, June 15, 2008 CET
From Party for a Federal Meritocracy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2591
MessageGenerally, we're not too concerned with the cabinet. Just put the current one in place in response to another offered line-up.

The ones we focus on, and would most want, are Justice, Defense, Finance, Internal Affairs, and Education and Culture.

We are always interested in Head of State.

Date16:19:46, June 15, 2008 CET
From Party for a Federal Meritocracy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2591
MessageLast message should have said "Head of Government" at the end.

Although we always believe the PFM should hold the Head of State position.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 13

no
   

Total Seats: 337

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

Random quote: "The whole uncivilized bunch on the opposite benches can get stuffed." - Craig Warwick, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51