We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Farming Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Movement Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2595
Description[?]:
To cut down on Government size and to improve animal rights, protect people and animals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Current: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Proposed: The fishing industry is nationalised, and the government sets production levels.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: This matter is left up to the local governments.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:28:15, June 19, 2008 CET | From | Chidan Party | To | Debating the Farming Act |
Message | We support Article 1, but not 2. |
Date | 05:56:45, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Farming Act |
Message | How exactly does nationalizing the fishing industry "cut down on Government size" ? |
Date | 18:45:32, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Movement Alliance | To | Debating the Farming Act |
Message | Because it is currently set as "the governent" and "local governments". |
Date | 03:28:37, June 21, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Farming Act |
Message | Thats only quotas you moron. You do know what a quota is don't you. |
Date | 06:27:14, June 21, 2008 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Farming Act |
Message | That just means the government decides on the issue, not necessarily that the government owns it or runs it. Heck, the government could say "we'll take no stand on this in any way". Leaving the matter up to the local government is just that, leaving it up to local governments and not deciding on it at a national level. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 173 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 414 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 163 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |