We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law Enforcement Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Liberal Party of Endralon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2596
Description[?]:
How the hell can cops placate an armed robber without matching or coming close to matching his fire power? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:16:33, June 22, 2008 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | Because remember if we outlaw guns, nobody will have them! duh! |
Date | 16:08:26, June 22, 2008 CET | From | Chidan Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | With more restrictive gun laws there wouldn't be any firepower to match. |
Date | 23:24:06, June 22, 2008 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | Kind of like with restrictive drug laws, drugs won't be a problem! |
Date | 02:13:57, June 23, 2008 CET | From | Chidan Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | Thank you for using that example ECP, couldn't have picked a better one myself. Clearly it's not that simple but I'm sure you will agree, less people would use drugs if they were illegal, that's basic logic, they'd be harder to buy for a start. The temptation of using them would be lessened as they would not be in immediate sight. |
Date | 06:24:28, June 23, 2008 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | But that in no way means we should expect no one to have them and therefor not equip our law enforcement with the tools required to handle those people. |
Date | 13:31:02, June 23, 2008 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Act |
Message | Besides, we shouldn't have to restrict the right of the people to own weapons when they will overwhelmingly use them for peaceful and constructive reasons. Arming our noble police men and women allows the law abiding to access what is often merely a tool, especially in rural areas, while deterring those who might otherwise use firearms in anti-social/illegal ways. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 387 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 250 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 113 |
Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
Random quote: "When women are depressed, they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another country. It's a whole different way of thinking." - Elaine Boosler |