We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapons Regulation Act (modif.)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Democratic Forum
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2597
Description[?]:
| According to recent opinion polls, 34.33% of rutanian citizens think that "Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried." Therefore RDF decided to alter our law proposal, because we in fact basically agree with above statement. This is for the protection of public security and national security as well. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapons, but certain types are restricted to designated places.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:23:51, June 25, 2008 CET | From | The National Party for the People | To | Debating the Weapons Regulation Act (modif.) |
| Message | No, no guns in public! |
| Date | 00:59:53, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Weapons Regulation Act (modif.) |
| Message | I don't understand why you didn't vote for this law, NPP, this law restricts guns in public! |
| Date | 03:24:51, June 27, 2008 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Weapons Regulation Act (modif.) |
| Message | I think we, as well as the NPP, voted against the proposal because it allows ANY guns to be owned by the public. I imagine I speak for the NPP when I say that restriction is not enough - a full ban is what is in order. |
| Date | 10:03:49, June 27, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Weapons Regulation Act (modif.) |
| Message | Hey, what are you talking about?? This was proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried. So, ONLY CERTAIN TYPES, not all weapons. It is a restriction, not opposite!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 143 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 450 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 6 |
| Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra. |
| Random quote: "All within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state." - Benito Mussolini |