We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Malaen Principle
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2597
Description[?]:
TMP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted only to landowners.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Current: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Proposed: Only those born in this country or to nationals receive nationality.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 65
Proposed: 60
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:05:00, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | Terrible. FIP Minority Leader Richard Lydon |
Date | 00:07:44, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Anarcho-Atheist League | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | This bill is an atrocity to the people of the Federal Republic. Only a fascist would propose and/or support these measures. Party Chairman Florentine Scott |
Date | 00:19:11, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | The vibrant and imaginative lexis and range of vocubulary of the LSFS and FIP is truely stunning indeed. |
Date | 00:29:19, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | Thanks! FIP Senator Gerald McCaffrey |
Date | 00:29:28, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Anarcho-Atheist League | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | Ha, I laugh. That comment is coming from a party who has the word 'and' randomly in their party name, where it makes little sense. I also seem to recall that when the party was nothing but a big corporation they were called "Solentia Corporation Incorporated" However, I feel as though that the comments provided by my party and the FIP adequately summed up the series of legislation recently proposed by the Conservative 'and' Morality Party |
Date | 00:34:54, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the The Malaen Principle |
Message | We are a Conservative Party as are we the Morality Party; thus we are the Conservative and Morality Party. If we had wished to complicate the matter, we would have called ourselves "The Conservative Party and Morality Party." However that is neither here nor there. As for SolCorps, "Solentia Corporation" was the name, "Inc." was it's status regarding liability of the shareholder- as is a requirement of all Corporations holding limited liability clauses in their outlines. Was there anything relevant you wished to add? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 190 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 235 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election. |
Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |