We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future
Details
Submitted by[?]: Folks Revolusjonær Kommunistiske Parti
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2598
Description[?]:
| The FRKP is a very pacifist party, and we advocate it as such. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:58:39, June 26, 2008 CET | From | NationalSocialistiska Partiet | To | Debating the Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future |
| Message | we need nuklear arms to defend ourself against enemys. the only thing u do when u take away our nukes is invite enemys to attack. |
| Date | 17:18:37, June 26, 2008 CET | From | Anarkistisk Føderation | To | Debating the Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future |
| Message | No actully the only things nukes does, is giving us more enemies.... |
| Date | 18:03:27, June 26, 2008 CET | From | (NWO) Saiserist Förening | To | Debating the Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future |
| Message | "Suppose there is an enemy out there who is less rational than we are, lets say Enemy A, and wants to conquer us. They are far stronger than we are. But, at the moment, we maintain a sizeable nuclear arsenal, and possess the capability to use them. If Enemy A tries to attack us, he will be annihilated by our nuclear arsenal, against which there is no defense. So Enemy A does not attack us, and instead conquers Nation B that was stupid enough to dismantle their nuclear arsenals under the absurd concept that this would bring "peace". Nation B becomes devoured in unprecedented blood and violence thanks to their pacifist agenda. Kazulia goes on to unparalleled prosperity and security. And in this way, nuclear weapons keep the peace. Once again, I accuse the FRKP of blatant warmongering." ~Secretary Kazimir Vavilov |
| Date | 23:40:35, June 26, 2008 CET | From | NationalSocialistiska Partiet | To | Debating the Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future |
| Message | that is exactly how i think |
| Date | 01:28:53, June 27, 2008 CET | From | Nasjonal Front | To | Debating the Revolutionary Communist Bill: Pacifism in the Future |
| Message | MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction. It's the system that the Nasjonal Front supports. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 237 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 205 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |