We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Liberation Front of Hobrazia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2598
Description[?]:
Given that the current legal situation could possibly cause harm to animals involved in bestialtiy, the CPH proposes to regulate bestiality to such an extent that only bestiality that does not cause harm to the animals involved is legal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning bestiality.
Current: Bestiality is illegal.
Proposed: Bestiality is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:01:55, June 27, 2008 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act |
Message | We would prefer an outright ban on bestiality, as animals have no means for consent. |
Date | 20:32:34, June 27, 2008 CET | From | People's Liberation Front of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act |
Message | Agreed, and we have changed the proposal. |
Date | 19:55:59, June 28, 2008 CET | From | First Party Of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act |
Message | What people do is entirely up to them in this regard, if they want to lower themselves to this kind of thing so be it |
Date | 01:46:02, June 29, 2008 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act |
Message | @FP: That's tantamount to animal abuse! Forget debasing one's self; this is an issue of protecting animals. |
Date | 02:15:03, June 29, 2008 CET | From | First Party Of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Animal Rights (Bestiality Regulation) Act |
Message | Animals are allowed as pets, thus it would stand that the animal was the property of the pet owner. So animal slavery, in that case what the owner does with that animal is his own business since he paid and owns that animal, it is not for government to say that he cannot have sex with it if he so deems. We are of course against the intentional harm of such animals, however it may stand to reason that the animal may enjoy it as well, so both get pleasure. *First party members and the rest of the chamber burst into laughter* |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 203 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 197 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
Random quote: "I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." - Muhammad Ali, 1967, refusing to fight in Vietnam |