We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hulstrian Communist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2598
Description[?]:
| Sometimes there are lands that are absolute necessary to the prosecution of the state's goals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:00:43, June 27, 2008 CET | From |  Hulstrian Communist Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
| Message | The HCP Central Comitee says: "There may be times wen the state absolutely needs a land to acomplish its goal. As such times do exist, then its better that there is a regulation, like the just compensation determined by the land-owner, which is already in our law." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 110 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 32 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 358 |
| Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
| Random quote: "Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred." - Martin Luther King Jr. |