We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Recreational Drug Act of 2600
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2601
Description[?]:
| This bill will: 1) Ban the use of recreational drugs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Current: The use of cannabis is legal.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:53:11, July 02, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | What a citizen wants to put into its own body should be a private matter |
| Date | 23:04:27, July 02, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | Not when it affects society as a hole, especially children. |
| Date | 23:13:57, July 02, 2008 CET | From | Seldonist Cognitive Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | The use of drugs helps people become Happy even in the face of a long and hard existence, the people must be Happy in order to accept their place in the social hierarchy. |
| Date | 00:10:43, July 03, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | We in the Progress Party will support this, but as long as we do not have to start a "War on Drugs" or other lame use of narcotics. As we believe having it forbidden is right, in order to keep the citizens informed that this is not good for you. But, I do not want the police to actively search. |
| Date | 00:10:56, July 03, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | We in the Progress Party will support this, but as long as we do not have to start a "War on Drugs" or other lame use of narcotics. As we believe having it forbidden is right, in order to keep the citizens informed that this is not good for you. But, I do not want the police to actively search. |
| Date | 00:26:50, July 03, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Recreational Drug Act of 2600 |
| Message | The law especifically bans recreational drugs, it doesn't start a "War on Drugs." We cannot tell you what local governments will do. That is out of our hands. Like all police departments, they have a narcotics division dedicated to do so. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 66 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 64 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno |