We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2601
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to kill animals.
Old value:: Killing animals is illegal.
Current: Killing animals is legal but regulated.
Proposed: Killing animals is legal but regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: Private hunting and fishing practices are banned.
Current: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:43:30, July 03, 2008 CET | From | The Green Manalishi Party | To | Debating the Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act |
| Message | We want to see this split. There are too many issues involved. |
| Date | 12:23:19, July 03, 2008 CET | From | Republican Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act |
| Message | Support all but the last. Why should we re-introduce harmful cars when our nation is presently subsisting quite happily on environmentally friendly ones? It allows us to export more oil for more gain. |
| Date | 13:53:54, July 03, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act |
| Message | Well, RPC we are not introducing harmful cars. We still enforce the most strict pollution standards on our vehicles. |
| Date | 00:00:08, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Republican Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act |
| Message | But still allow people to buy economically harmful vehicles? It makes no sense |
| Date | 16:07:20, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Ecological and Environmental Protection and Freedom Act |
| Message | Most terrible of an idea, guru. This hardly protects the enviorment, and in terms of freedom it's doing nothing but chaining us back to oil, flesh and forest destruction. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 406 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 309 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington |