We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty Withdrawal (2602)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2602
Description[?]:
| Eventually the whole Folkstmma will be present to vote, and we know there is enough popular support for this bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Article 2
Withdraw from the Global Emancipation Treaty.
Article 3
Withdraw from the The Comprehensive Gay Rights Treaty.
Article 4
Withdraw from the Anti-Deltarian Trade Alliance.
Article 5
Withdraw from the Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons.
Article 6
Withdraw from the Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:01:54, July 06, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | Seriously, wait until the next session to do this over. |
| Date | 00:17:25, July 07, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | DSP: Kettle, Clay Pot. Do the math. |
| Date | 03:52:31, July 07, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | I wait until the next election session to put something to vote again, I rarely put the same thing to vote, and even then it's because one was a bill bill and the other is a positioning one. |
| Date | 05:18:48, July 07, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | On the same note, very rarely does the DSP have a party who would support their bills absent during a vote. In other words: What's your point? |
| Date | 05:29:30, July 07, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | Not my fault I'm the only leftist party. And my point is it's in bad taste to put the same thing to vote more then once in the same election cycle. |
| Date | 08:50:08, July 07, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | It is in bad taste if a full caucus was reached during the vote. |
| Date | 09:58:16, July 07, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal (2602) |
| Message | It's in bad taste period, though I suppose if sya less then half were in attendance for the vote IE did'nt choose to abstain then it would be alright, but since that's not the case.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 235 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 263 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 102 |
| Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
| Random quote: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein |